+1 -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:35 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Wiki for the project
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton < [email protected]> wrote: > It strikes me that there are two different wikis being talked about right > now. > > At least. > One is one that we need in the podling for incubation activities. > > That was what I was thinking. A wiki where we could start laying on the plan for the next week, month, quarter, listing the tasks that we think need to be done, in what order, along with who volunteers to do them. With a project of this size I think we'll quickly be stepping on each other's toes if we don't have some way to coordinate. It could be done in an issue tracker as well. But I think a wiki is easiest to get started with. So my proposal is we continue using the list to discuss, but use a wiki to record the "plan of record", which is always open to further debate on the list, as well as revision. > The other(s) are wikis that are part of the OpenOffice.org infrastructure > for a variety of purposes and may be public facing in different ways. > > Right. That is something else, very important, but less urgent. But these are related. We should develop a plan on the podling wiki for how we will migrate the user-facing OpenOffice.org wiki to Apache infrastructure. -Rob I'm not sure they should be comingled at this point. After all, something > we may need quickly in the podling is a wiki where we gather around the > campfire on what the others are and what to do with them, how long will they > stay where they are, etc. > > - Dennis > > PS: I know that the LibreOffice folk have been rapidly rebranding and > reissuing user documentation as well, along with on-line and off-line help. > I am not sure whether it is all Creative Commons Attribution (some have > that as part of a dual licensing, it appears, others seem to be rather murky > concerning what the license might be), but I suspect we need to give some > consideration to whether and how that effort is accommodated. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Peters [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 05:55 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Wiki for the project > > What will happen to the existing wiki at > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org > which has quite some content (including > the main documentation pieces)? > > Would we maintain two wikis or merge > into Apache infrastructure? How can we > migrate existing content? > > I'd be eager to help with migration efforts (I > have admin rights on the wiki). > > Frank > > > +1 on the wiki request. > > > > Mentors,some advice, please, on how we make this happen? Is things > > something that PPMC members have rights to do? Or do we ask the IPMC? Or > do > > we enter a request in the Infrastructure list? Or some Infrastructure > issue > > tracking system? > > > > I'm volunteering to do the leg work (or is it finger work?) if someone > can > > point me in the right direction. > > > > Also, what level of approval in the project is typically needed for > routine > > requests like this? Is a +1 with no objections sufficient? Or do > projects > > typically have a more elaborate voting procedure for this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Rob > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Raphael Bircher<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi at all > >> > >> On http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html there is no > >> wiki emptry. We should use the incubator wiki to collect informations, > or we > >> get a seperate wiki for OOo? > >> > >> If we have to use the incubator wike, how we have to marke OOo pages. It > is > >> ok, if every site beginns with "OOo"? > >> > >> Greetings Raphael > >> -- > >> My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/ > >> > > > >
