Frank Peters wrote: > >What caught my eye was the statement that some material was under > >special licensing and you'd have to notice that on an individual-page > >basis. > > That is indeed the case and the licensing situation on the > wiki has traditionally been awkward. But couldn't Oracle > remedy this by (as copyright holder) relicensing the content > under AL like done with the source? > Hi Frank,
um, I think the point made here is that certain content is *not* copyright-shared with Oracle, and thus cannot be (easily) relicensed? Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgpqCfQbkGXkk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
