On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Martin Hollmichel <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/15/2011 12:45 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >> Am 15.06.11 00:15, schrieb Ivo Hinkelmann: >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> good idea to remove it, preferred the whole module. It saves us a lot >>> of build time! >> Build time no matters in this case. No user will understand this >> argument. And the question is for wath we are here. To make a good >> product for end user, or to play around with code? >> > this raises a good question: how to make Product Management decisions ? > The past has shown, that decisions driven by one main contributor are > not necessarily the best ones. I'm wondering how can we establish > something like a voting system for doing the right or at least good > decisions. I also think, the one contributor - one vote thing also don't > work out in this user centric matter (I think it will work well for > engineering centric questions). We need something to identify good > representatives of user communities to be able to do good decisions. >> As QA I can't accept to remove samething to save Build Time, sorry. >> Byside you can dissable binfilters if you build samething who does not >> afffect the binfilter. > It's important to bring the interests of all groups, engineering, QA, > marketing and users to a common ground. This raises also the question > which priorities are driven by whom, and how they get represented by whom,
Short answer: don't vote! Yes, we want to include everybody! Here's a few links: http://s.apache.org/H8J http://s.apache.org/D16 http://community.apache.org/committers/ > Martin - Sam Ruby
