Am 16.06.2011 13:29, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or manager
or any name that could create the impression that this person has more
rights than the others. Maybe we can choose 'contact' as a neutral
description in case something turns out to be needed? Or is there even a
more neutral word?

Christian Grobmeier has mentioned "workforces". That sounds interesting. Is
there more about that in the documentation somewhere?

Its a term from me, it is not official.

It is a bit like Sam said: if you subscribe to a mailinglist, then you
part of a "workforce".
Like subscribing to [email protected] makes you - if you
write emails - to a contributor and therefore to a part of the
developers workforce.

If the project decides that a new workforce is needed, like
"translations", it can simply be established with a new mailinglist
like [email protected]
Everybody can subscribe and help with working.

That being said, "workforce" is a bit an unnecessary term - i
described a bunch of people having fun to discuss similar topics at
one mailinglist.

:-). I like that style very much! Thank you for the additional explanation!

Ingrid

Reply via email to