Am 18.06.2011 11:23, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Manfred A. Reiter wrote:
I would also avoid to deny those language projects to be
seperated from Apache.org ... in other words /home should
be at lang-klingon.ooo.apache.org and not oooinklingon.org
Right (the example; the wording above seems to say the opposite): the
native-lang projects are part of openoffice.org.
ok, sorry for misunderstandig ... (I thought it is a double negation)
but it's fine that the example is unambiguous
<http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=Ci4HO3kMAA&search=unambiguous&trestr=0x8004>
The Italian N-L project, for example, takes care of:
- Translating OOo into Italian (a few liaison persons keep contacts
with the global l10n project, and coordinate volunteers on the
Italian N-L mailing list)
- Releasing OOo in Italian by means of QA approval (same structure)
- Mutual support between users in Italian (mailing list and forum
in Italian on the OOo infrastructure)
- A web site it.openoffice.org with product information in Italian.
I think there should be a place for this in the new infrastructure.
About other activities:
- Maintaining the Italian writing aids is done by me and PLIO, the
Italian association, and could continue like this.
- Italian developers interested in core work write in English on the
English mailing lists.
- Media relations, events and fund-raising are managed through PLIO and
this, again, could continue like this.
So we are basically using the OOo infrastructure for activities related
to the language and (besides writing aids) we use the PLIO
infrastructure for the rest.
Regards,
Andrea.
Yes to all above.
M.
