On Jun 21, 2011, at 5:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Announcement - two confluence wikis are now available for the Apache 
>> OpenOffice.org project.
>> 
>> The Apache OpenOffice.org Community Wiki is at 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/
>> 
>> The Apache OpenOffice.org Developers Wiki is at 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV/
>> 
> 
> Excellent.  Thanks, Dave!

You're welcome, Rob! My pleasure.

>> Anonymous viewing is allowed.
>> 
>> In order to create content sign up for a confluence wiki account at 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/signup.action
>> 
>> If you have an apache.org email address it is easiest for us for you to use 
>> it for the wiki.
>> 
>> The Community wiki is for everyone.
>> 
>> The Developers wiki is for project planning and documentation. Permission to 
>> create content must be limited to the Podling PMC, OOo committers, 
>> Foundation Members, and those who have signed an ICLA 
>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt). To be authorized, once you have 
>> signed up for the wiki, please request access rights by replying to this 
>> email with your ID.
>> 
> 
> I'd like to consider whether the  Community Wiki might work better for
> project planning.  I certainly see the requirement that documentation
> be created by those who have signed the iCLA, especially documentation
> which is included in a release.  That is called out on the CWIKI FAQs
> [1]
> 
> "the touch point is whether you want to reserve the right to bundle
> the documentation with a release and/or check a copy into an ASF
> repository"
> 
> Although documentation certainly falls into that category, I don't see
> why project planning does.  In fact, as we trying to coordinate the
> migration of the OpenOffice.org website, I think we'll need to
> coordinate with various groups, not all of whom are committers, and
> some of which are still evaluating whether they will join the project
> or continue their work elsewhere.  So I think that for the near term
> at least, such project planning is best done in a space where anyone
> can participate.  Since these plans do not get checked into SVN, or
> become part of the release, I don't see how this could be a problem,

This was my sense and how I took Eric's comment. I did move over a page. [2]

Raphael created [3] which is similar both with this link [4].

I certainly think that the home page language on both wikis can be improved. 
Please feel free. It looks like my day job is calling for my attention today.

Regards,
Dave

[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Transition+Planning
[3] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV/Migration+from+Kenai+to+Apache
[4] http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Home


> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/#Index-Butwhatifwewouldlikethecommunityatlargetohelpmaintainthespace%253F

Reply via email to