Grzegorz Rajda schrieb: > Good evening, > > All write this to other mailing-list as response to mail from Key > Schenk. I wan't discus this with You and back to OOo development. What > You think about that? > > Last changes in infrastructure (Oracle, LibreOffice etc.) needs from us > new goals to create reborn release of OOo. I have some ideas and proposals. > > 1. Easy structure: > - one page in native languages (auto-detect language, use right strings) > - one repository for code (if somebody can commit, they can do something > for whole source code, one method, without individual keys) > - one bug-tracker for any language with bugs merging (developers who > know english and navive lang should merge bug reports.) > - one code, one standard, one development guide for everyone. (should > have specification of interface planing/create and programming) > > Result: > - openoffice.org - in native language direct > - openoffice.org - easy to use one support (language automatic) > - openoffice.org - have only required and optional files in source code > repository > - openoffice.org - have easy to contribute web interface (for example > for translating [web, help, etc.]) > - openoffice.org - easy to programmers contribution, > - openoffice.org - is best than MS Office in all releases! > > 2. In future: > - every day we have new developers > - every day we have more optimized algorithms > - every day we have best closed standards reverse engineering > - every day we have more happy users > - every day we win in all categories with our competition! > > We can do it together! How You think? > I think, there are some interesting thoughts, but a lot of things to discuss. "One bug-tracker for any language" for example would cause a lot of work. What does "one standard" mean (for example)?
Regards Michael P.S. I write it, because hush means accordance and I don't agree in some points.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
