On 06/22/2011 01:38 PM, Yuri Dario wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
>> That would be fine. It is not very urgent, as we won't build OOo on OS/2
>> soon. We can just leave that single file out. If you want to continue
>> development of the port, you can add the missing file.
> the file is not missing from tree, it only have the wrong license/owner in it.
yes, it seems that for the os/2 port some more files were added from
some sdk of other stuff, there all required to get moved to the external
stuff to get separated from the OOo tree. I'll be glad to help with this,
> thanks!
>
Martin


Reply via email to