OK, since there is apparently no dependency on odma.h, I am not going to do anything. When someone has a dependency, I'm available.
- Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Kai Sommerfeld [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 02:16 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Licensing odma.h (was RE: Some more strange files in the OOo code - the Ghost of ODMA Past) Hi, On 22.06.11 11:09, Mathias Bauer wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > On 22.06.2011 04:20, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> The ODMA Support showed up in the Novell editions of OpenOffice.org. >> >> I don't think the copyright notice in odma.h should be a problem. >> What is missing is any additional information about the license. >> Also not sure why you need it if there is no code that uses it in the >> base distribution. >> >> If you want, I am sure I can make an updated version of the file, >> clear it with Betsy Fanning at AIIM (although that BSD-style license >> is meant to apply to all current code), and post an updated odma.h on >> the web site. >> >> Is that useful or would I be wasting my time? > From the view of the "old" OOo project ODMA integration is not built, > but at least a downstream version of OOo is using it. So we should not > drop it. Thus enabling us to use a "clean" header would be appreciated. > +1 > My suggestion is as follows: we don't need to wait for odma.h, for the > time being we just don't take it with us. If you provide us with a file > with a suitable license, we can add it later. > +1, this makes perfect sense. - Kai. > Regards, > Mathias >
