Better to let subversion resolve coordination problems than to put up obstructions to jfdi, IMO.
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 24, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: Good job, both. My little mystery was trying to figure out why SVN was not letting me apply the patch. Then I figured it out. The patch had already been applied. ;-) Perhaps a convention in the future would be that the committer who wants to review and merge a patch first "claims" the patch on the list, by responding to the [PATCH] note, saying "I have this one" or something equivalent. -Rob On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dick Groskamp <[email protected]> wrote: Op 24-6-2011 20:18, Marcus (OOo) schreef: Thanks for the fix. :-) As I don't know yet how to add a patch to SVN, I've corrected the text directly. I hope it's OK for you. Of course I've mentioned you in the commit message. Marcus No problem. Just stumbled over them when I was playing with SVN. (I'm also on the learning curve like yourself I presume ;-) ) -- DiGro Windows 7 and OpenOffice.org 3.3 Scanned with Ziggo uitgebreide Internetbeveiliging (F-Secure)
