I did some modest streamlining. I didn't alter the questions. I did not touch the "How has the project developed ... " question.
I am not sure which of these topics may be from guidance on providing the report. Alexandro, will you be making the changes along the lines you suggest? On Friday I can add the latest PPMC summary and anything about the size of ooo-dev on the community growth question or whatever other title we give that. - Dennis PS: My name, "Dennis," is Irish, not French or Spanish. Not to be confused with "Den[n]ise" although I was called "Denny" when I was a child. My sisters still call me that. (And I shall remind myself that Alexandro is not pronounced like Alex when we have an opportunity to meet.) -----Original Message----- From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 11:08 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org) On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir <apa...@robweir.com> wrote: > I've drafted the report directly on the wiki. > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2011 > > Since the Board meeting is the 20th, and they need one-week to review, > we need final sign off by the 13th. > Judging from the other reports I will try to make it more consice. For example: Explaining that is our first report, seems a bit verbose. Also avoid the Q&A format and instead draft it as action points. The core action ponits would be, - Asset migration - governance structure - general project setup Under migration we can put new website, wiki, etc. OOo code revision. Under governance structure, we can put we did the initial commiter draft with some of the numbers Dennise has report. General project setup we can talk about the OOo site in Apache. So in essence same information, but different format to make it more objective and to the point. > > I will be out all next week starting the 12th. So if we can reach > consensus on this and get a Mentor to sign off by EOD Monday, it would > be great. > > > -Rob > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> > wrote: > > On 4 July 2011 21:01, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> > wrote: > >> +1 on circulation on ooo-dev. > >> > >> I'm not sure which wiki you mean and whether that would limit > participation or not. > > > > Sorry, I was referring to the wiki that is used to submit the report > > to the IPMC. It is publicly writable. > > > > Ross > > > >> > >> - Dennis > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] > >> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 03:06 > >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2011 ( > ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org) > >> > >> [ ... ] > >> > >> The most common practice that I am aware of is: > >> > >> - someone writes a draft and circulates via the dev list for comment > >> - after 72 hours or so comments are collated and it's put in the wiki > >> - mentors are asked to sign it off > >> > >> An alternative which also works well, is to do it directly in the wiki > >> and request changes be made directly. > >> > >> Ross > >> > >> [ ... ] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > > Programme Leader (Open Development) > > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com > > > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
