Am 07/18/2011 06:31 PM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Marcus (OOo)<[email protected]> wrote:
...
So, all is not necessarily lost - but it does depend
on whether you want to reload the SVN repo.
I don't know how you thought about CVS but the respective
repo is already on SVN.
I am confused. Apparently (I am a newcomer) OOo has moved
from several VCSs:
CVS --> SVN --> Hg --> SVN (Apache)
In each conversion one necessarily looses some information.
Have we lost significant history during any of those conversions?
Perhaps we can take a previous SVN (assumming it exists) and
do the conversion progressively from there?
Just wondering though.. I am sure the people doing this are
taking their time for a reason ;).
Please don't mix things up. I'm talking about the SVN repo that has the
website stuff and not the core source code of OOo.
Of course we want to keep the repo history of the OOo source code. But
IMHO it's not necessary to keep itfor the website. Of course we can do
this, too, if someone means it's important. But it would be the stuff
from February, 23rd until today. The older stuff is already lost.
Marcus
