On Jul 20, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > This does remind me that it's really desirable to be > able to build OO with clang: not exactly due to the > licensing but for cleanliness and portability.
I tried some time earlier this year, building OOo's trunk with a trunk clang on Mac OS X. Failed in various places (some were errors in the OOo code not yet flagged by any other compiler, some were issues also flagged by most recent GCC but to which OOo had not yet been adapted, some were clang errors like <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9421>), somehow lost interest and gave up back then. But probably worth re-evaluating. -Stephan
