To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected] and confirm by following the instructions in the mail you receive in response
(and don't lend your laptop to people ;-) Ross On 20 July 2011 14:41, Richard E. Breed IV <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey folks...a friend used my laptop, and I am getting tons of emails I do not > understand from a really smart & interesting group of folks...but, I need to > unsubscribe and there's no such button at the bottom, can you help? > > THanks..chard > > Richard Edwards Breed IV > > --- On Tue, 7/19/11, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Ross Gardler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Hunspell and MPL license > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2011, 6:29 PM > > On 19 July 2011 19:41, Eike Rathke <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was digging a bit into 3rd party licenses for the Hunspell issue and >> came across Category B: Reciprocal Licenses in >> http://apache.org/legal/3party.html and noted that Hunspell is >> tri-licensed also under MPL 1.1 that would be permissive as long as the >> code is distributed only in binary form and the NOTICE file labels its >> reciprocity, if I understood correctly. > > Good find. You do understand correctly. Although please note that the > page you link to is an earlier draft kept for reference only. The > official document is linked from the header of that page and can be > found at http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html (specifically for MPL > you need http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b ) > > Ross > >> >> Currently OOo needs Hunspell in source code form only because very few >> patches are applied to be able to build it on Solaris, Windows and >> MingW, and one patch against a stack smasher. Am I right in assuming >> that if Hunspell adapted the upstream version such that these patches >> were superfluous, then AOOo would be able to build against a system >> Hunspell or on systems where Hunspell is not available or for binary >> distributions a build could include a binary of the library if the >> proper NOTICE entry is provided? To me this sounds like a solution to >> the problem. >> >> Eike >> >> -- >> PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. >> Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD >> > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com > -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
