On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Danese Cooper <dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rob, > > You may not know that I am the CTO of Wikimedia Foundation. Let me tell you > that you want to first watch the experiment that is the new Article Feedback > feature play out awhile on Wikipedia. We at WMF have no idea whether we're > even measuring the right things with that tool yet. >
I've seen a similar approach done with documentation and support pages for commercial products as well. So I think the idea has a good pedigree. But you do need to ask the right questions. I think the right questions for product documentation are likely to differ from the questions used at Wikipedia. > Danese > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir <apa...@robweir.com> wrote: > >> Don't know if you've noticed this new feature that has recently been rolled >> out. >> >> Scroll down to the bottom of this, or any other Wikipedia page: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org >> >> Readers are invited to rate the page on completeness, objectivity, >> etc. Presumably this information is aggregated and in the future can >> guide editors towards the pages that need the most work. >> >> Would an approach like this have any benefit for our website, for doc, >> tutorials, etc.? >> >> -Rob >> >
