The Incubator Branding Guide notes:
"Podlings websites SHOULD contain the Apache Incubator Project logo as sign of affiliation."

More importantly, the key point is that podlings must ensure their public websites make it clear they are a podling; or rather, that they are not (yet) an official Apache project or product. Using the incubator logo in some secondary page space is fine; likewise, the footers or other secondary branding on the pages should note the podling is undergoing Incubation.

Oh, yeah, the site does most of that that already!  8-)

I think it might be useful in this case to have a new "General" link to a subpage about "What is Incubation" or something - i.e. a brief overview of why it's incubating and what that means for end users and the larger community.

Overall, the best idea is to figure out how this project wants to manage it's branding with some more specific proposals, and then ask for approvals/assistance from Apache Legal and Branding. Having concrete questions to answer is much simpler.

- Shane

On 8/3/2011 2:25 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Sounds good.  I think there are some rules about how the Apache
symbols are used for in-incubator podlings.  (There is a revealing
topic on T-shirts somewhere, either legal-discuss or
general-incubator, I think.)

- Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: Dave Fisher
[mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011
10:33 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: status of
OpenOffice logo?

Hi Kay,

Amazing the volume of emails that came in while driving from San
Francisco to Los Angeles.

On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:

There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the
existng OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example,

http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/download/index.html

This page lacks headers and footers, which brings me to...

I know there's been discussion about the current OpenOffice.org
logo

Regenerate the current headers and footers, but it needs to be done
via wrapping in the Apache CMS.

In ooo/site/trunk/templates

sidenav.mdtext single_narrative.html skeleton.html

Take skeleton.html and make a ooo_skeleton.html

In ooo/site/trunk/lib

path.pm view.pm

In path.pm:

our @patterns = ( [qr!\.mdtext$!, single_narrative =>  { template =>
"single_narrative.html" }], ) ;

Add a pattern to identify the html that kenai wrapped before. This
will be tricky as there may be html that we want to just push through
- I think that was "*.html.html" file in Kenai.

This pattern can refer either directly to ooo_skeleton.html or refer
to an "ooo_narative.html" which refers to ooo_skeleton.html.

In view.pm we will need a python routine to pump content into the
markup.

For now concentrate on turning one or two to the current pages into a
"template" and then we can do the steps outlined above.


vis a vis trademarks, possible changes due to Apache etc.

But could someone give us an update on this?

When we have our samples together then I think we should describe to
Trademarks and Legal-Discuss what we have done. They'll tell us if we
need to change anything. The project might want to do a little "bike
shedding" on the design.



Can we use the existing logo without changes (i.e. ref to Apache?)
or ???

I thought we would add a small Apache feather to the header
somewhere, but the footer might be ok, too.


There seems to be few Apache projects. e.g Buildr, which don't seem
to use the Apache logo, and since there seems to be a consensus to
keep OpenOffice.org at a site openoffice.org, I'm wondering if we
can just proceed with what we ahve in terms of headers for web
pages without change.

A lot of projects have the Apache logo in one corner and the project
logo in the other.

My personal feeling is that the colors on the Apache feather clash
with the light sky blue of OOo. I have seen some examples where the
Feather has different colors but these may be legacy.

Regards, Dave



--
------------------------------------------------------------------------


MzK

"If you can keep your head when all others around you are losing
theirs - maybe you don't fully understand the situation!" --
Unknown

Reply via email to