+1 default_mode=standards_compliant
On Aug 4, 2011 10:50 AM, "Hanssens Bart" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dare I mention "quirks mode" ? :-) > > In that case, I'd strongly suggest to make the standards mode the default, > not the quirks mode (otherwise it's too easy to let this issue proliferate) > > Bart > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 4:36 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [odftk-dev] Re: request help on ODF data signature issues > > So, from the ODF Toolkit perspective, I think it would be best if we had a > flag that the programmer could set, to make it operate in "standards mode" > or "hacks mode" or something like that. It is useful to have a "reference > implementation" mode where it follows the standard strictly. This could > be used for interop testing with other products. And it is also useful to > have a mode that is compatible with current OOo/LO. > > -Rob > > Hanssens Bart <[email protected]> wrote on 08/04/2011 05:39:32 AM: > >> From: Hanssens Bart <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Date: 08/04/2011 05:40 AM >> Subject: [odftk-dev] Re: request help on ODF data signature issues >> >> Hi, >> >> As far as I can tell, these are known implementation issues. >> OOo (and most of the other products based on that code base) do not >> follow the spec IMHO. >> >> See also >> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39657 (ds namespace in >> LibreOffice) >> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107864 (ds namespace in > OOo) >> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276 (multiple >> X509Certificate in OOo) >> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108286 >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Bart >> >> ---- >> >> From: Biao Han [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: donderdag 4 augustus 2011 11:19 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: [odftk-dev] request help on ODF data signature issues >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am the Apache ODF Toolkit developer and working on ODF data >> signature feature. Several issues need to help. >> >> 1. Different from other xml file, such as content.xml, why >> documentsignatures.xml is not namespace aware? For example, >> "Signature" element, only the local name Signature, not including >> "ds" namespace. >> 2. Why Open Office generates three same content X509Certificate >> elements for X509Data in documentsignatures.xml? >> 3. How to generate XML ID datatype value? UDDI is too short... >> OpenOffice > ID_003a00a40036005c0099001b004900a400960062003000c500f900e300af00f7 >> UDDI ID_79200773-ec61-43d5-b079-a26a081bfb08 >> >> Thanks & Regards >> >> Biao Han (Devin) >> SOA Standards Growth, Emerging Technology Institute(ETI), IBM China >> Software Development Laboratory >> Tel:(86-10)82450541 >> Email: [email protected] >> Address: 3/F Ring Building, No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software >> Park, No. 8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, >> Beijing, P.R.C.100193 >
