<snip>
I thought the idea was to have two wikis, one for (among other things)
"official documentation" that requires contributors to sign the iCLA,
and the other for "community documentation" that does not. It would seem
to me that the items you described fit into the "official docs", while
much (I suspect the majority) of the existing OOo wiki contents fits
more into "community docs", with the few "official" docs on the existing
wiki either under the Oracle brand and appropriate license or
essentially obsolete (for example, the wiki version of the user guides,
which only go up to v3.2).
If this is the case, then it seems to me there is no real problem.
Simply apply different rules to the two wikis. What am I missing?
--Jean
A good example to my mind is the separation @ Ubuntu between
* https://help.ubuntu.com/ -- which is the "official" website, and
the sub-site
* https://help.ubuntu.com/community -- which carries the headline
"Community Documentation"
