On this type of discussion, it's easier for everyone if we stand
on-topic so that we can structure threads
On 08/08/11 00:53, Rob Weir wrote:
At steps 10 and 12, you have "branding changes" We should list
exactly what that entails, especially since we'll want the
reapplication step 12 to be quick.
I assuming that under the name "branding changes" we include:
1) OpenOffice.org -> Apache OpenOffice.org and associated logo changes
2) Removal of Oracle logos and name
3) Replacement of privacy policy and disclaimer
4) Update of page edit license text to require Apache 2.0 for new contributions
Yes, good points, though such content changes are functionally separate
from the (infrastructure) migration. I have suggested in a separate
branch that we set up separate task area with its own leader to work
these issues.
5) Suspension of legacy wiki admins or other super users who have not
been appointed to their role by the PPMC. We could be proactive in
this by identifying such users and inviting them to join the project
now, to ensure no loss of continuity.
You have made this point a number of times on other threads and had a
range of robust responses. This is nothing to do with branding changes
and its not good DL etiquette to go off topic to cross-link
discussions. Perhaps we need a specific thread on this, but not on this
discussion, please.
