(To provide a little context while Gav may be asleep)

On 8/12/2011 9:26 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Gavin McDonald<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Kay Schenk<[email protected]>

...snip snip snip...

Just a thought:  Could you do the entire website in MediaWiki, with only
exception cases (download page, etc.) done in HTML?

Just to put a blocker on this right away, we will not be using the wiki as the
main website or the main entrance into the OOo world.


Since it is not self-evident to me why a wiki would be a problem for
the main website, could you explain this a little further?  Is there a
technical problem?  Remember, the wiki already comprises several
thousand pages of website content, so in a very real sense the "main"
website is already the wiki.

Performance. As I understand it, the bulk of all apache.org content is served statically as html files. Putting a major project's homepage website like the future office.a.o (or whatever name) up as a wiki would add a significant amount of load to our servers, even for a highly efficient wiki engine.

The beauty of the CMS is that while it's easy to work on the pages (either via SVN or browser), the final result is simply checked into SVN and then the resulting .html file is just stuck on the production webserver site. Some projects use a wiki to manage their homepages (i.e. project.a.o, separate from any community wiki they may have), but the physical homepage that end-users see is typically static html that's been exported from their wiki site.

Gav or infra folk can provide more details, but you should plan on adhering to whatever performance restrictions the infra team requires for the main website.

- Shane

Reply via email to