Am 08/15/2011 10:45 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:27:29 +0200, Ingrid von der Mehden
<[email protected]> wrote:
Am 15.08.2011 21:13, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weir<[email protected]> wrote:
[..]
ooo/trunk/core --- all the OOO340 stuff
ooo/trunk/l10n -- all the language stuff
Please do the directory rearrangement in SVN. I have no
objection to moving stuff but if it's possible to match
the old history later on, having these changes out of SVN
won't help.
On 'old' OOo there are currently already two separate hg
repositories. No directory move within either of them was proposed.
Only a target directory for each repository needs to be selected. I
don't see how this should affect any history mapping later.
Ah .. It's OK then. (sorry as I'm mostly new to the codebase)
Is there some development plan after the intial repo is done or
can committers start making massive changes (merging branches,
adding ports, etc ..) right away?
Cheers,
Pedro.
Yes, there should be a plan. AFAIK we have agreed that we want to make
as less changes as possible to make a fast release of a 3.4 possible.
After that is done we can do bigger changes (e.g., no binfilters
anymore). Or we can do the initial import and right after that a new branch.
So, we should have one branch for the AOO 3.4 release and the other is
the new trunk "branch".
Marcus
