Hi Mathias,
Le 16 août 11 à 08:34, Mathias Bauer a écrit :
On 16.08.2011 01:31, eric b wrote:
Hi,
Doing some performance tests, I just figured out the types.rdb
file is a binary file, just provided in the sources.
Can someone explain me :
- why a binary blob is directly provided in OpenOffice.org sources ?
( OOO320_m1x for instance, but DEV300 is probably the same)
I think that this is the reference file that is used to check the
IDL files against incompatible changes.
Thanks to confirm what I had in mind :-)
Does this method to allow "OpenOffice.org growing" only ? If we
systematicaly compare to an existing but fixed blob, we have no way
to remove useless/no longer needed services ? (but maybe I
misunderstood )
With a cold start, occurs a big and costly I/O read write process.
Searching what seems to cause that, it appears the .rdb files are
good candidates. I can be plain wrong, but I think there are a lot of
services embedded in the interface, who probably could be loaded ...
say somethingl like on demand or at least differently, no ?
- how to create a new types.rdb (and what are the mandatory tools) ?
The reference file must not be recreated as it belongs to an older
version that the current source files are compared against.
Thinking rwice I start to see better, and I can imagine people (say
companies providing services around OOo) playing with IDL files and
introducing some issues, indeed.
In fact I never played too much with idl files (seems to be a simple
interface, that UNO will handle, isn't it ? ), excepted when we added
code for Impress annotation mode, and that's probably the reason why
I ask stupid questions in this domain I don't know well :-)
Regards,
Eric
--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
