On 08/17/2011 06:33 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is not unusual to have subdomains map to folders.

That is, you might maintain http://openoffice.org/de

and have http://de.openoffice.org map to it.  Even if someone
navigated to the former, it might appear to have redirected to the
second case.  (Try going to<http://nfocentrale.com/nfoWorks>.)

My impression is that even works for add-on domains.  You could map
http://deopenoffice.org to that subdomain which is actually anchored
on a folder of the overall web-site tree.

Yes...and I think this is a good approach (see also Dave's followup). Why?

We need to again consider implementation aspects.

using http://openoffice.org/de

as an actual "location" entity gives more flexibility.


My existence proof is the fact that my web hosting service provides
all of these cases and they run Apache httpd.  (I have only one
web-hosting account and primary domain name.  Although the subdomains
exist I don't publicize them, but the add-on domains are the many
ones I own such as orcmid.com, odma.info, nfoWorks.org, etc.)

- Dennis

PS: Technically, you could even have http://ooo.apache.org and
http://openoffice.org served from the same pages, though I think that
is not such a hot idea, especially at the outset.

-----Original Message----- From: Marcus (OOo)
[mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 13:41
To: [email protected] Subject: Re: openoffice.org domains
transferred to ASF

Am 08/17/2011 10:00 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Shane
Curcuru<[email protected]>   wrote:
[ ... ]
Most of these don't appear to have much independent content.  I
wonder whether something like this would be more maintainable going
forward, to have a destination page for each language:

Assuming our eventual TLP home is:  http://openoffice.apache.org,
then we could have:

http://openoffice.apache.org/de http://openoffice.apache.org/es
http://openoffice.apache.org/pl http://openoffice.apache.org/it

and so on.

Then have the existing domain names redirect to these.

Yes, should be a good way to have one home that we have to maintain
but some redirects when a user has spelled the domain name not 100%
correctly.

Alternatively, we could do this via openoffice.org addresses:

http://www.openoffice.org/de http://www.openoffice.org/es
http://www.openoffice.org/pl http://www.openoffice.org/it

or even via subdomains:

http://de.openoffice.org/ http://es.openoffice.org/
http://pl.openoffice.orgl http://it.openoffice.org/

Any committer should be able to add a new language at
http://www.openoffice.org/foo, but wouldn't adding a new subdomain
require working with Apache Infra.  Or is there some magic we can
do

My favorite way would be the [language].openoffice.org pattern as it
looks better and more professional.

However, if it is way easier maintainance to have the
www.openoffice.org/[language] pattern, then we should go this way.

with Apache server to make these map automatically via a rule?

But I think this all leads back to the same basic question:  Do we
want users to have a different home page than project volunteers?
I think so.  But we can still do that page via markdown, stored in
SVN.

I haven't seen other voices in the past. So I think it is agreed in
the meantime.

Marcus



The question is only what domain names we direct to those pages.


Reminder: Apache projects normally host all their content on a
*.apache.org domain.  I believe that in ooo's case, the future
project will want to host some content on other, non-a.o domains;
however we should strive to make most of the project be on an
Apache site.

- Shane


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"Those who love deeply never grow old;
 they may die of old age, but they die young."
                        -- Sir Arthur Pinero

Reply via email to