On 08/26/2011 11:52 AM, drew wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 14:21 -0400, Andy Brown wrote: > <snip> >> > >> >> Personally, I think the subject says it all and to the point. To bad >> that all questions to mailing list and fora can not be summed up so easily. >> > > Hi Andy, > > The subject is a wonderfully succinct statement of a preference. > > That's good. > > That is a consideration, but do not lose sight of what the root issue > here: > > "The sugar daddy has left the house!" > > No Corporation with deep pockets and paid staff to due things for the > community. In the end it will come down to who steps up to perform > tasks, develop/setup services, perform monitoring and maintenance on > same. > > Ok - let's take a look at total posts. > > Just sticking to en, here. > The user ML open in July 2001 > oooForum goes on line Oct 2002 > user.services goes live Sep 2007. > > For most of this time the OO.o site(s) pointed to the ML for support, it > offered links that even populated a first email, to a subscriber only > list - as an post from a non-subscribed address [usually]. > > oooForum for most of this time is the highest ranked source for hits > under most web search engines. > > The following numbers are rough ( but have to start somewhere..) > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/0/04/Ooo-user-support.pdf > > I'll update that file over the next few days, with some more precise > figures and converse as we go. ...
When you do, you might want to use OOo instead of LO 3.3.3 to do it :-)
