On 29.08.2011 15:27, Rob Weir wrote: > I sent this note out a week ago. We discussed and generally agreed to > this proposal. I certainly did not see any objections. But this plan > appears to have been generally ignored. > > In particular, we now have unrelated changes intermingled with the > addition of missing files from Hg. This means that there is no > revision in SVN that is identical to the Hg tip. This is unfortunate. > It will make some approaches to merging more difficult.
indeed. oops. unfortunately your proposal contained more items than i could remember :-/ but i guess we can take the initial import as the base revision, there shouldn't be that many changes to the dozen or so missing files. > Let's review this list again, and try better to coordinate going > forward. If anyone has improvements on the list, please feel free to > comment. But's let get on the same page. for the most part the items 2 to 5 can be done in parallel, right? guess item 6 also (restricted to CWSes with target 3.4) regards, michael
