On the wiki question, I think OOOUSERS should continue to be used for transition work. Or OOODEV could be used if it needs to be limited to committers (perhaps the case for this activity), although it means power observers can't contribute there and have to do so by some other means.
This is transition work and the Confluence wiki seems like a good place for it. The MW may be interrupted or disrupted and it is probably a good idea to *not* put such development-transition intensive content there. Also, "the migrated wiki" is not the live wiki at OpenOffice.org. So doing anything there will create collisions. It is also not fully migrated in that it is not operating in place of what folks see via OpenOffice.org as far as I know. The current Confluence wikis avoid confusion and are stable for this particular purpose. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 01:45 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: A systematic approach to IP review? On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: [ ... ] > 7) Goal should be for anyone today to be able to see what work remains > for IP clearance, as well as for someone 5 years from now to be able > to tell what we did. Tracking this on the community wiki is probably > not good enough, since we've previously talked about dropping that > wiki and going to MWiki. > talked about it yes but did we reached a final decision? The migrated wiki is available under http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki and can be used. Do we want to continue with this wiki now? It's still not clear for me at the moment. [ ... ]
