--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: ... > > HunSpell code is tri-licensed under GPL/LGPL/MPL. >
That particular licensing scheme is rather weird: LGPL implies that it can become GPL so you could just say dual licensed LGPL/MPL, and then, once you make something pluggable, the GPL basically becomes unenforceable but let's not get into that right now ;). > If I understand corectly, Apache considers MPL 1.1 to be > "weak copyleft" and we have some limited ways (as a > binary of using it in our releases. > Yes we can. I am not sure what a company would think about it though: some lawyers are more strict than others. What does IBM use in Lotus Symphony? > > Individual dictionaries, however, can have their own > license as you know. So there may be some that we cannot > include in the release, but we can still point the user to. > It looks like we might have a bunch of them that we can relicense to AL2. We will have to wait for the SGA to know for sure but if it does happen, it is a nice treasure that we should take advantage of. Pedro.
