Hi;
I like it. I've been thinking that we should campaign moving
opensource extensions to apache-extras, as it could make
things easier for maintainers if they don't want to sign
an ICLA.
Of course I won't complain if you think it's better to include
this directly.
Pedro.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:45:14 -0400, Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to gauge the interest in including Groovy [1] as a scripting
language.
For those not familiar, Groovy is a dynamic language for the JVM that
includes features like closures, builders, and dynamic typing.
There is currently a Groovy For OpenOffice extension [2] for this
available under LGPL. I have contacted the author regarding
additionally licensing the extension as Apache and he would be
willing
to do that to include it.
Groovy itself is under the Apache 2.0 so I thought it may be a good
fit.
I am willing to work on this if there is interest.
Best regards,
Carl
[1] http://groovy.codehaus.org/
[2] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/GroovyForOpenOffice
