hi,
who will response to the submitted JIRA issue?
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com
tel:54747
Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8,
Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193,
P.R.China
Oliver-Rainer
Wittmann
<orwittmann@googl To
email.com> ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org,
cc
2011-09-27 21:27
Subject
Re: [legal] How to clarify, if
Please respond to usage of Boost C++ source libraries
ooo-dev@incubator is allowed
.apache.org
Hi,
here is the link to the submitted JIRA issue -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-101
Best regards, Oliver.
On 27.09.2011 14:59, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>
> On 27.09.2011 14:16, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>> <orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to clarify, if we can still use the Boost C++ source libraries
>>> in our
>>> project.
>>> It is licensed under the Boost Software License - Version 1.0, found at
>>> http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt
>>>
>>> Boost is widely used in our source core. It is included in project
>>> via the
>>> "ext_sources" process.
>>>
>>> What is the right way at Apache to clarify, if such a 3rd party stuff
>>> can be
>>> used, if its license is not mentioned at
>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
>>> Should I submit a corresponding JIRA issue in JIRA project 'Legal
>>> Discuss'?
>>>
>>
>> If there is doubt, certainly send a note to legal-discuss asking them
>> to classify the license. This particular case looks easy. It is not
>> placing any restrictions other than including their notice. So we
>> would need to add their notice to our NOTICE.txt.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>
> Thank you, Rob.
>
> I agree that this case should be no problem.
> But as its license is not mentioned on the above mentioned Apache
> website, I will ask legal-discuss.
> I have seen that JIRA mails from its JIRA project are mirrored to
> mailing list legal-discuss. Thus, I will submit a corresponding JIRA
issue.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
