Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external communications explicitly.
The project has a real problem right now with asserting itself as the OpenOffice.org project and defining how it will interact with downstream projects. Is the community going to take ownership of this? It would be nice to see a statement from the PPMC making it explicit what they wish to tackle and, where possible, how. For example, after a flurry of discussion about improved security reporting processes and collaboration opportunities is the PPMC going to deliver or will this just die down and go away? NOTE I'm not asking for a full strategy in the report, just a statement indicating whether or not the PPMC feels that it owns these issues. If it doesn't want to own them then who does? Ross On 7 October 2011 15:33, Shane Curcuru <[email protected]> wrote: > Tip: the board always appreciates well written reports that follow these > reporting guidelines: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting > > - Shane > > On 10/5/2011 8:05 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >> Added some items for the October report for OOo. Feel free to chip in. >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2011?action=diff&rev2=11&rev1=10 >> > -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
