On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi; > > Looking at how big, and mostly cosmetic but necessary, a > change it will be to bring in all the SGA license changes, > and given that it requires manual intervention and is not > something that can be done in one huge mega commit ... > > I think we should create a branch for this changes in merge > them in two steps: corresponding to both SGAs. This way > merging CWSs and bugzilla patches can go on without pain and > people can get started on the header changes.
I recommend separating review from (automated) execution. If this is done, a branch shouldn't be necessary... Robert
