On 10/17/2011 1:58 PM, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Am 14.10.2011 18:22, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Whereas it is in the self-interest of those entities
Hmm, I think it's not that easy. We see Team OpenOffice.org (as the
legal entity behind the old Community Council) still in the
repsonsibilty of an uncredible amount of users which gave their support
in the last decade to OpenOffice.org (the old one).
And it was not Team OpenOffice.org acting so that we going to have two
forks of the old codebase in the future.
We'd look foward to support collaboration and to re-unify forces, so
that we come to a stronger product and project than we ever had, but I
don't think that it helps to ignore history of OpenOfffice.org completly,

Martin (Team OpenOffice.org e.V.)

That's great news - I'm sure with your experience the Apache OpenOffice PPMC will be very glad to see you participating on the mailing lists here and helping to get a new release out for the podling. 8-)

I understand that this is a difficult situation for a large number of people and organizations. The best way forward here at Apache is to work with this PPMC on figuring out the new way forward with a future Apache OpenOffice product that can make use of as much of the great code and goodwill that the previous OpenOffice.org project created as possible - both so we can support the end-users looking for a high-quality product, and so we can support other developers wishing to use our permissively-licensed code.

Two key factors for moving forward here at Apache include:

- Working in the Apache Way, on our public mailing lists. I'll repeat an old phrase that is critical to understanding how we work:

  "If it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't happen."

- Working with the PPMC - and other relevant organizations - to respect everyone's trademarks. That includes the "OpenOffice.org" registered trademark and logo which now belong to the ASF here in the USand other countries, as well as the many other closely related trademarks used by third parties in various countries.

- Shane

Reply via email to