> -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 8:17 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gavin McDonald > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > >> <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > In reply to this message on [email protected], vote for > >> > the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the > >> > OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. > >> > The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page > >> > > >> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integra > >> t > >> e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project>. > >> > > >> > The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 > >> > hours from now. > >> > > >> > A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of > >> > the proposal. > >> > > >> > [ ] +1 approve > >> > [ ] 0 abstain > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: > >> > > >> > > >> > >> +0, which does not means "abstain" but means I have no objections, > >> +but > >> do not volunteer to help with the migration. > > > > It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do > > anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion. > > All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with > > the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen. > > Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let > > things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle. > > > > The attentive reader would note that I did not vote "0". I voted "+0". My > vote means exactly what I say it means, nothing more, nothing less.
I read exactly what you wrote, do not think I am not attentive. Your arrogance around here lately is beyond belief, pack it in > > -Rob > > > Gav... > > > >> > >> -Rob > >> > >> > GUIDELINES > >> > > >> > ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are > >> those > >> > cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate > >> > message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the > >> > last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote > >> > from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the > >> > ooo-dev > >> list with this subject are not counted. > >> > > >> > DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the > >> > votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other > >> > discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with > >> > anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with > >> > subject beginning > >> [VOTE][DISCUSS]. > >> > > >> > > >> > - Dennis E. Hamilton > >> > tools for document interoperability, <http://nfoWorks.org/> > >> > [email protected] gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
