Strong +1 from my side.
It most not be a replacement of the [email protected]. OOo has many
Forks, not only OOo and LO and we should reale share securiti
informations. A indipended list is important.
Am 19.10.11 15:23, schrieb Michael Meeks:
So,
It seems despite the promising flower of agreement here between Dennis
and myself; we seem to have failed to attract any volunteers - and an
openoffice.org branded list is not a suitably neutral place.
Which leaves me to suggest freedesktop again; failing any violent
disagreement to the contrary, or any solid reason why a single project
should own, claim, brand and/or control such a shared security list,
I'll ask to have:
[email protected]
or somesuch created; I suggest a three-way owner / moderator structure
with Dennis, Rob and myself providing some spectrum of balance. It would
of course help to have the previous subscriber list available to
pre-populate it, but that can be inferred from the archives if
necessary.
Any objections ?
All the best,
Michael.
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:21 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
+1
..
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:33 +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote:
old/original OOo security list [email protected].
Which of course is highly sub-optimal, since it is an openoffice.org
branded list, soon to be Apache owned - which is not neutral. Apparently
we can't administer it effectively, and it is hosted on a server which
people have said may have been flaky / dropping mail (also not ideal).
I would really love someone to volunteer with some
[email protected] style domain, that is sufficiently
neutral (if freedesktop will really not do); and to have a diverse admin
environment too to increase mutual confidence.
All the best,
Michael.
--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
