Hi Rob, Kazunari-san, Marcus, * 2011/10/22 Marcus (OOo) <[email protected]> > > Am 10/22/2011 02:33 AM, schrieb Kazunari Hirano: >> >> Hi Rob and all, >> >> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Rob Weir<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So these are user lists. Will we want language-specific translation >>> and localization lists at some point? That is why I thought it would >>> make sense to have "user" in the name. So then in the future we can >>> have, e..g., ooo-translate-de, etc., if needed. >>
sounds great for me ;-) >> You are right! >> >> How about letting them discuss on what kind of native language lists >> they would like to have in the future in their general native language >> list like [email protected] ? >> :) >> >> May I propose a way to create a native language list? >> :) >> In general we create a native language list if requested and as requested. >> ("oo" means an ISO language code) >> 1. First someone should propose [email protected] at >> [email protected] >> 2. Once created, in [email protected] they will >> discuss in their language about additional lists for their language. >> 3. They discuss on names of lists etc. then they propose additional >> lists for their language like [email protected], >> [email protected] and more. >> >> "Let them discuss what they need in their language" the best way, I think. >> :) Yes, but that are decisions in the future, after first AOOo release, and when the community is growing ;-) > > Wouldn't this also mean "tell us which MLs you need additionally and we (the > PPMC) will > create them." no, that doesn't mean that at all. > Finally, this will lead to the same ML structure like in the old OOo project. > And this is the point we want to avoid with a new ML handling, right? > A user-list at this time is probably uncontroversial and general-list as well, Of course, this general ML must have a very strong link to [email protected]. Decisions are made only her on [email protected]. > > So, I'm OK with creating one new ML for other languages but we should be > careful with creating > additional ones. Yes, we should only create these lists, if we have the moderators, as Rob proposed in his first email. and BTW Marcus, if it should be ONE user-list for pt-br and pt-pt should be a decision of the native speakers we have just here with us. ;-) M.
