BTW, Its clear to me the final product name is
Apache OpenOffice.org and I already used it in Rev. 1184898. Pedro. --- On Mon, 10/24/11, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW: > When we do the rebranding stuff again > (sick!) we should have a final > product name at hand at that time. > > I suspect that the restraints on identification of > incubator releases will apply to however it is branded. > > It looks like the first one, at least, is definitely a > "Technology Preview" release. It and the second will > certainly be ways to bring the QA, localization, and related > activities back into action as well. > > Exciting times ahead! > > > - Dennis E. Hamilton > tools for document > interoperability, <http://nfoWorks.org/> > [email protected] > gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 07:34 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [proposal] development for the first AOO > release > > Am 10/24/2011 03:18 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose the following development > milestones on our way > > to the first AOO release: > > > > - "IP cleared" milestone > [ ... ] > > > > - "features back" milestone > > For this milestone we should work on bringing back the > features which > > are lost in the previous milestone. I do not think > that we have to bring > > back every feature for a first release. Thus, we would > have got the > > possibility to work on the features which are of most > interest. At some > > point we could create a "release candidate" and start > working on > > stabilizing it for a first release, if we think that > the "must have" > > features are back. > > [ ... ] > > Any remarks/comments/improvements/adjustments? > > Any objections to follow such plan for our first > release? > > It's fine to see a kind of roadmap starting. > > Also to have a first public intermediate step with a clean > IP is great, > towards our first "real" Apache release. Then everybody can > see that > it's really going forward with OOo (as often the feeling is > the opposite > in the public when you read news and blogs). > > And of course we have to make clear that this milestone is > really just > an intermediate step and not what the most would expect. > > BTW: > When we do the rebranding stuff again (sick!) we should > have a final > product name at hand at that time. > > Marcus > > [ ... ] > >
