Maybe it would be good to think of three progressions: 1) Migration - moved to ASF or retired. 2) Administration - with sysadmins / moderation in place. 3) Integration - with proper links, navigation and urls. Also branding and legal stuff.
BZ may still need 2) and 3) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:30 PM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote: > Um, I think there is a lot of how to submit a bug, how to find bugzilla > information on OO.o that will need to be cleaned up still. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 13:54 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Migration Status Page > > Am 10/24/2011 10:42 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Marcus (OOo)<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Am 10/24/2011 07:39 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I think that we should update URL column with changed URLs when >>>> appropriate. >>>> >>>> The new URL could be placed two rows below the old URL. It some cases this >>>> will be an interim URL. One example is: >>> >>> Good idea. I've changed it in this way. >>> >> >> I like it. >> >> I also added Bugzilla and SVN. Although these have already been >> migrated, weeks ago, it is good to give the visitor this information. > > And for us to see that at least something is green and done. ;-) > > Marcus > > > >>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:16 AM, drew wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 12:55 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Rory O'Farrell<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:34:27 -0400 >>>>>>> Rob Weir<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Btw, as I had imagined it, the columns would be used like this: >>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Unknown (which is the same as abandon)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suggest unknown should mean "not yet decided"; admittedly, if >>>>>>> it is difficult to decide, "abandon" is probably a very strong >>>>>>> option. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> My point is that abandonment does not require an explicit decision by >>>>>> this project. It is what will happen by default if there is no >>>>>> proactive effort for a given service. >>>>> >>>>> Good point >>>> >>>> I've been told that backups of everything exist and can be accessed by >>>> contacting Andrew Rist. >>>> >>>> I've updated the website, extensions and templates rows. >>>> >>>> I reported the current outage with extension and templates. There is a >>>> link on the migration page. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Installed OO.o (the last 3.4 binary from OO.o) to a fresh machine and >>>>> three things that perhaps should be on the migration page >>>>> >>>>> - Asked me to register >>>>> - Asked if I wanted to check for updates >>>>> - Asked on second start if I wanted opt in to usage information tracking >>>>> >>>>> so should those go onto that page, [likely I missed the discussion, so >>>>> sorry if this has been covered already] if so I can add them. >>>> >>>> Sure, what are the service urls? What is the consequence to a user if >>>> these are not accessible? >>>> >>>> (I've already seen plenty of reports on the users MLs that update checking >>>> has been known to fail for quite awhile.) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> //drew >
