On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew Rist wrote on 2011-10-26 00:34: >> >> I do not understand why this is easier than continuing on the existing >> list. > > when I asked that last time, I heard various replies: >
Oh, Florian, you have either misread or have been mislead. Every one of these points is false. If you really had this impression, there is a tragic misunderstanding here. > - You need to be an iCLA signer to be on that list. > False. No iCLA is required to participate on the list. It never was before and no one has suggested adding that requirement. Where exactly did you read this? > - You need to be an Apache contributor to be on that list. > False. Where exactly did you read this? > - We have no administrative access to that list. > False. We've offered to allow TDF/LO moderators. > In the meantime, a bunch of other proposals have come in. > > Looking at the history of this issue (Michael outlined it very well), I > think a neutral, trusted ground is the best way to cooperate in this matter. > > And again, I think everyone benefits the same from my proposal, with no one > overly preferred, and nobody losing anything. It demands the same from > everyone. > > Florian > > -- > Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org> > Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation > Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 > Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff >
