Hi,

i will continue my evaluation of libwww [1] as a replacement for the neon library that we can't use in the future because of the LGPL license.

libwww would be the preferred replacement because of the WebDAV support.

"Libwww is a highly modular, general-purpose client side Web API written in C for Unix and Windows (Win32). It's well suited for both small and large applications, like browser/editors, robots, batch tools, etc. Pluggable modules provided with libwww include complete HTTP/1.1 (with caching, pipelining, PUT, POST, Digest Authentication, deflate, etc), MySQL logging, FTP, HTML/4, XML (expat), RDF (SiRPAC), WebDAV, and much more."

The license is BSD like and i was already in contact with one of the developers and they would be interested to grant it to Apache if there is enough interest to work on it in the future. It looks like an inactive project but they still receive patches from time to time and it is used in several projects. Well it is a complete implementation of a standard (HTTP 1.1) and besides bugfixes probably not too many things to do. Ok there is still room for improvements in some areas...

Having such a HTTP client library written in C might be a good enhancement or extension of an existing Apache project. As far as i know there exists only Java based HTTP client libraries. Or as an own top level project if enough interested people are available.

Anyway i will check if we can use it as a replacement for neon and based on the fact that it supports FTP as well, we can perhaps replace libcurl in then future too. But that is not so important at this time.

If anybody is interested to help with this effort you are welcome. Beside the reimplementation of the WebDAV UCP (handles all http file access today) we have to integrate libwww in our build env as other external libs on all the supported platforms.

If the evaluation fails and we can't use it we can use libcurl for plain http file access. And can later focus on WebDAV by using Apaches own stuff implemented in Java.

Any opinions or objections others than Java is bad?

Juergen


[1] http://www.w3.org/Library/

Reply via email to