--- On Sun, 10/30/11, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am not sure how Ohloh works, but I guess the > alternative > > was to leave it pointing to the previous Hg server > that > > is abandoned until it dies ... and then attribution > > history would still be lost :(. > > Except if somebody would host the readonly, historic > version of the hg repos, right? > There is one in bitbucket that I've dubbed the the "unofficial OpenOffice.org historic archive". All my respect to the people that made OpenOffice.org great, but again the issue is that I am not sure how Ohloh can point to that archive and not give the impression that OpenOffice.org is dead. I assume the current Ohloh maintainers did try. Pedro. > > > > cheers, > > > > Pedro. > > > > --- On Sun, 10/30/11, Eike Rathke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Whoever had the brilliant idea to make Ohloh's > source code > >> repository entry for OOo https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice > >> point to the AOOo repository instead trashed over > 10 years > >> worth of 10000s commits of 100s developers. > Congratulations. > >> > >> Eike > >> > >> -- > >> PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in > all private > >> communication. > >> Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 > 9E96 > >> 2F1A D073 293C 05FD > >> > > > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de >
