Have you looked at what we were doing in OOo? If still up, you can see the releases notes and also the relevant tools.openoffice.org project pages, as well as qa.openoffice.org
Am in wrong in believing it's good not to throw out the baby with the bathwater….? Louis On 14 November 2011 20:41, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au> > wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 November 2011 11:21 AM >>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Is it time for a build machine? >>> >>> It looks like we have several options, described here: >>> http://ci.apache.org/ >>> >>> Does anyone have an opinion on which one we should use? >>> >>> Although getting this to work across multiple platforms will be a big >>> effort, we don't need to do it all at once. Getting a single >>> platform up and running would not be very difficult, for example Buildbot >>> with Linux. And we would benefit from even that. For example, this would >>> enable non-developers to grab builds to test. As you've probably noticed, >>> we've had a few people ask how they could help with testing. But without >>> builds the only ones who can test are those who can build AOOo themselves. >>> >>> I'm poking around at the doc here: >>> http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/current/full.html >>> >>> I've also signed up for the bui...@apache.org list. >>> >>> But I could really use some help to move this forward. So, if you are >>> interested in helping, let me know. >> >> Note an issue has already been created. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4086 >> > > OK. One step ahead of me. That's a good place to be ;-) > >> Not sure if your thinking is the same as Andrews. >> > > Very close, at least for the core build part. > >> Gav... >> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -Rob >> >> >
