Am 08.11.2011 23:40, schrieb eric b: > Hi Dennis, > > Le 8 nov. 11 à 22:45, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit : > >> I concur on reverting the patch. > > > Me too : Andre explained everything and convinced me that the issue > needs to be fixed correctly. > > Though, to my eyes, there is one big issue remaining : I'd like to > study what has been implemented (the full diff) when the new > configmanager was introduced, and I still don't know how to proceed : > sb111 (and other associated cws's) are no longer available (any > suggestion is welcome).
Though it's a bit late, here's a suggestion: sb111 was integrated some time ago, but you could try to get its changes from the check-in comments. If Stephan did it as expected, the comments should contain an "sb111". You could also use "hg serve" on a local Mercurial repo of ooo340 and try to use the graphical visualization to identify the changes. Regards, Mathias
