On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > New editions of documentations and re-issued versions available on-line can > provide an ODF Authors feedback location, when that is the authorship of the > materials. > > However, there remain printed editions and downloaded PDFs and ODTs that have > old feedback information. > > An interesting challenge is how to preserve or redirect such feedback > requests, or whether to do it at all. >
Any idea what this feedback has been, say in the last 18 months? I would be surprised if we receive momentous feedback on 2.x documentation sets, for example. And there is a limit to how much sleep I'd lose over two reports of typographical errors per year. I'd leave this to ODFAuthors to investigate. They have members on the AOO project as well. If they think it is worth the trouble, then they are free to make a proposal. -Rob
