Am 24.11.2011 um 19:50 schrieb Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]>: > Hi Mathias; > > I wondered the same when I suggested they should be treated > as documentation, and still it classifies as weak copyleft. > > --- On Thu, 11/24/11, Mathias Bauer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just a dumb question: why do we think >> that the dicts are source code? At least those without >> patches are distributed without any treatment. We just >> package them. So where is the difference between an MPL >> library and an MPL .dic file? Just the extension and the >> encoding of its content. >> > > You mean like just tar them all and put them with the binary > release?
Yes. Even packaging as extension and deploying these packages as part of a binary release does not look fundamentally different than bundling a library. Regards, Mathias >>
