Am 30.11.2011 11:16, schrieb Gianluca Turconi:
This message, as Andre Fischer suggested in the thread "GPL'd
dictionaries", is a separated discussion in order to find a final
consensus about how to provide Linguistic Tools replacements after the
removal of GPL'd modules.

The solutions that were suggested (though without volunteers' manpower
to implement them ;-) are:

a) download the extension (assuming that the right locale can be
detected) automatically from the extension repository during
installation;

b) as last step of the installation, pop up a web page that, among
other things, tells the user that there is a dictionary extension that
can be installed and what its license is;

c) let the user know that there is one (or multiple) linguistic tools
pack extension for his/her native language when the main AOO binary is
downloaded.

d) to consider the distribution and inclusion of GPL'd Linguistic Tools
as 'mere aggregation" according to GPL.

Point d) needs legal endorsement from Apache, of course.

IMO, in a transition phase, point c) is the easiest one.

In the long run, point d), if legally doable, is the better one.

Regards,

Gianluca

From a user point of view we can't only deliver an Office without solution d). Coming along with an Office without a "out of the box" spell checking is unprofessional.

Solution a) is not good because opening an internet connection at installation time without telling what's going on looks pretty insecure.

With b) I as a user would notice this as "nice to know" as I expect this to work out of the box and close the nag screen. And as a user I'm not interested in license stuff.

The same for c): Why should the user care because this should work out of the box.

Regards,
Olaf

Reply via email to