On 2011-12-14 6:26 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm really concerned about the tendency of the AOO project to keep
proposing and seriously considering new lists (well that is probably
over stating it, but I am genuinely concerned).

I've tried to share this concern as well.


Each time you create a list you separate the community from itself. It
should not happen until there is a proven need for it. Splitting the
community in this way leads to questions like "which list should this
be on" and subsequently "which list should I search to find the answer
to this".

The most recent example is the I10n proposal. It will, probably,
become necessary to create such a list in the future. But i10n affects
everyone, not just those doing translations. The discussion about how
to structure the I10n effort in AOO should happen here where everyone
can easily find it.

Suggestion: instead of creating two Italian lists, create only the users-italian@ (whatever name) one.

Then create the i10n@ list, and use that for the dev-italian@ work - or any other development work in different languages. That way, people working on code or translations in different languages all have one "home" for the time being.

Yes, some Italian discussion will be moot for the other folks on the list, but given that everyone on the list is focused on various kinds of internationalization, they will be tolerant of different language conversations.

Just a suggestion... not sure if it works, but it's worth thinking about.

- Shane


Clear email subjects will allow people to quickly skip over emails on
topics they are not concerned about, but it ensures that nobody is
forced off into a quiet corner where they are all alone.

Ross

Reply via email to