I have no objection to the coloring of the icons. I object to the use of an "ODF" tag on them with no indication that these are for implementation-specific file associations. I also failed to include the illustrative image from my last note. I will correct that.
- Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 16:30 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: old colored vs new monochrome icons On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > Rob, > > As far as I am concerned, unless those icons are issued by the OASIS ODF > Adoption TC, in a way that they are usable with anyone's ODF-supporting file > associations, that discussion doesn't count. (If the OASIS ODF Adoption TC > did something like that, that would be cool and consistent with the notion > of making ODF support visible.) > Honestly, I have no idea what you're talking about at this point. Do you have any objections with the proposal that has been made about coloring the icons? Or do you have a different set of icons that you want to counter-propose with? -Rob
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
