On 17 December 2011 16:57, Donald Harbison <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Ross Gardler > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> A further, related question (I'm working on a blog piece) would we say >> "Apache OpenOffice (incubating) plans to release a reference >> implementation of the OpenOffice.org suite in ...", or is some other >> phrasing preferred? >> >> What's your definition of a reference build? Would an official Apache > release of OpenOffice 3.4 meet that definition?
That's a good question and I think is probably what I'm asking ;-) I'm a little confused as to what brand the release will push, Apache OpenOffice or OpenOffice.org. Ross > > >> Ross >> >> On 17 December 2011 16:51, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > We're nearing a copyleft-free build milestone. What I hear - and take >> > this as an estimate, not a commitment -would be Q1 for a 3.4 release. >> > >> > -Rob >> > >> > On Dec 17, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what >> >> would I say? Q1 2012? First half 2012? February 2012? >> >> >> >> Ross >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >> >> Programme Leader (Open Development) >> >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >> Programme Leader (Open Development) >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >> -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
