On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 12/18/2011 01:08 AM, schrieb Jean Weber: >> On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, "Allen Pulsifer"<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> "The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified the >>> first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release." >>> >>> I think I would prefer Apache OpenOffice v1.0 >>> >> >> >> That would totally confuse most of the current users of OOo, I think. --Jean > > +1 > > This would indeed lead to confusion which is not necessary. We have many new > things like Apache as new home. But the code is the same (even when we have > to cleanup and rearrange some things), so the version numbering should > remain. It shows a continuity of the weill-established software and not a new > thing that appears from nowhere.
+1. I've been preparing the migrated www.openoffice.org - I am about to commit breadcrumbs and a top navigation plus the missing development and distribution projects. Regards, Dave
