Hi *, On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:18:07AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > We should keep in mind that for many extension developers it's > probably ok to create a SF, GoogleCode or whatever project to host > the extension code and the binary. But i believe that there are also > many developers who simply want to put there macro collection in an > extension container with the necessary meta data and want share it > with others. Means they simply want to upload it for broader > availability without creating their own project or the necessity to > have their own webspace for hosting the binary extension. > > And i think this is even more important for templates. People create > a nice template and would ideally be able to upload it directly from > the office. Ok for upload we would need some kind of registration > and authentication to do that. But that would be very convenient for > users.
not only templates, there is a whole set of NON-CODE extensions, that is you do not need to be a developer nor write any code to build very useful extensions! http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Non-code_extensions You can not expect those "extension creators" (new term, as they are not developers in the sense of developing source code) to create a SF project or the like. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpB822Z6lZQA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
